Introduction / Charles R. Pigden
The autonomy of ethics / A.N. Prior
Professor Prior on the autonomy of ethics / J.M. Shorter
Hume's own 'ought' conclusions / Annette C. Baier
Much obliged / Wade L. Robison
A letter from a gentleman in Dunedin to a lady in the country / A Gentleman
Hume's master argument / Adrian Heathcote
Heathcore's Hume / Alan Musgrave
On Heathcore against Hume's law / Norva Y.S. Lo
Comments on 'Hume's master argument' / Charles R. Pigen
Comments on 'Hume's master argument' / Gerhard Schurz
Reply to my bountiful critics / Adrian Heathcote
In defence of Hume's law / Gillian Russell
The significance of Hume's law / Håkan Salwén
Snare's puzzle/Hume's purpose: non-cognitivism and what Hume was really up to with no-ought-from-is / Charles R. Pigden
Comments on Salwén and Pigden / Norva Y. S. Lo
Reply to Lo / Charles R. Pigden
Non-trivial versions of Hume's is-ought thesis / Gerhard Schurz
On the triviality of Hume's law: a reply to Gerhard Schurz / Charles R. Pigden
Reply to Pigden / Gerhard Schurz
Barriers to implication / Greg Restall and Gillian Russell
Comments on 'Barriers to implication' / Peter B.M. Vranas
Comments on Restall, Russell and Vranas / Gerhard Schruz
Supervenience and the autonomy of ethics: yet another way in which relevant logic is superior to classical logic / Edwin D. Mares
Moral conclusions from non-moral premises / Stephen Maitzen
Comments on 'Moral conclusions from non-moral premises' / Gerhard Schurz
Substance, content, taxonomy and consequence: a comment on Stephen Maitzen / Charles R. Pigden
Reply to Pigden and Schurz / Stephen Maitzen.
